The buildings
How Harrow’s officers treated bathrooms on Hatch End sites
Harrow committee reports on Hatch End sites show what officers looked at when bathrooms were part of a conversion, a rebuild or an extra floor. None of them sets a rule; each was a recommendation about one site.
For a house on Uxbridge Road that was to become four flats, officers in April 2018 checked the layout against paragraph 5.12 of Harrow’s 2010 Residential Design Guide, which asks for flats to be stacked so that no bedroom overlaps a living room, kitchen or bathroom above or below, and found that the habitable rooms stacked consistently. They did not treat the neighbouring house’s side windows serving a landing, a bathroom and cloakrooms as primary windows to habitable rooms, so those windows were not protected sources of light. They recommended approval.
Harrow: Planning and Developments, with the link to search Harrow’s planning register · Harrow: Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document, adopted 15 December 2010 (PDF, file 23276)
On Royston Grove, where a bungalow was to make way for a three-storey building of three flats, officers in July 2018 found that six small side windows serving bathrooms, to be obscure-glazed, would in that context cause no undue overlooking of the house next door. At Alden Mead, residents raised stacking, noise, plumbing and foul drainage over a proposed extra floor; officers in October 2021 answered that the new flats repeated the layout below, that sound insulation must meet the Building Regulations, that foul drainage was not a planning consideration, and that plumbing lay outside the application.
Harrow: Planning and Developments, with the link to search Harrow’s planning register